News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by _boffin_ on Thursday November 12, 2026 @11:53PM (#50478501)
This just a quantized version of 3.8 next flash on strata that’s branded?
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by cvadict on Friday November 13, 2026 @12:00AM (#50478554)
100% my exact impression of this project as well
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by rurban on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:12AM (#50479049)
And HIP support (amd) broken.
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by selcuka on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:17AM (#50479094)
I'm not saying it's not, but if this is the case, how do we think it beats 3.8FN in benchmarks?
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by Aurornis on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:31AM (#50479188)
> I'm not saying it's not,

Their GitHub repo and HuggingFace pages directly state that it's based on Qwen3.8 Flash Next. Their inference engine is called edge0-strata because it's a strata fork.

They fine tuned it and tweaked the architecture.

The real question is if the model performs better on general purpose tasks, or if it was just fine tuned to increase the benchmark scores.

Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by selcuka on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:54AM (#50479375)
Fair enough. I was just responding to the "just a quantized version of 3.8 next flash" claim. Benchmaxxing via fine-tuning is a very plausible possibility.
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by baxtr on Friday November 13, 2026 @09:19AM (#50483864)
Similar to a Linux distribution then?
Re:Edge0-145B: Frontier AI Capabilities on Your Own Computer by kimixa on Friday November 13, 2026 @01:27PM (#50487656)
I think the major difference is they have a set of profile data they use to manage the placement of expert weights.

"Hot" commonly used experts are kept on the GPU, and "cold" less used experts are bumped to system ram and calculated on the CPU. So it can run larger than vram sized models without completely crippling performance.

I'm not exactly sure what the changes they made to the architecture are for, perhaps they're aimed at extending the difference between the "hot" and "cold" expert usage?