The NYT has been infamous for pushing false narratives from government sources for decades. Iraqi WMDs is the famous example, but they've also credulously run plenty during the current wars.

Being wrong, and accepting incorrect information without appropriate vetting is not, at all, "pushing false narratives" which is a strong accusation with, to my knowledge, absolutely no basis in reality once you leave the right-wing mainstream media bubble.

What exactly is the difference between uncritically publishing information from government sources and pushing false narratives? If their reporters are being fooled over and over again every time a war needs to be justified, it's hard not to see a pattern that looks very similar to collusion in producing propaganda.