News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: My $300 embroidery machine needed a subscription... by jsLavaGoat on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:38PM (#50473902)
Right and at first people won't mind, but eventually they will not be able to help themselves enshittifying. Which is why I'm big on open weight models. I hope in 2031 there's a giant Mac mini sitting in my office running one.
Re:Show HN: My $300 embroidery machine needed a subscription... by onefiftymike on Thursday November 12, 2026 @07:01PM (#50476244)
Would a giant Mac Mini just be a regular mac?
Re:Show HN: My $300 embroidery machine needed a subscription... by shermantanktop on Thursday November 12, 2026 @09:54PM (#50477523)
[delayed]
Re:Show HN: My $300 embroidery machine needed a subscription... by xp84 on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:11AM (#50484691)
Clearly you don’t know Apple naming. It’s be a Mac Mini Pro Max Extreme.
Re:Show HN: My $300 embroidery machine needed a subscription... by elephanlemon on Friday November 13, 2026 @10:32AM (#50485007)
I hope that good hardware is available sooner than locked down hardware.

From the Jensen thread:

> I hope this won't change NVIDIA's refusal to block inference for unsigned and registered open-models in the firmware of modern GPUs. Anthropic and others are pushing hard on this. First the hardware export ban, eventually the software one via hardware-enforced execution controls like IETF hinted at