Re:Electric Ship Batteries Promise Compact, Cooler Power
by nradov on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:45PM
(#50474009)
Correct. And military nuclear vessels are also operationally safe because superpower navies are willing to spend a fortune on training and paying qualified nuclear engineers and technicians. Despite those large budgets they still struggle to maintain minimum crewing levels. Merchant lines can't afford the personnel expense.
Re:Electric Ship Batteries Promise Compact, Cooler Power
by rbanffy on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:54PM
(#50474127)
For merchant ships we’d need completely sealed idiot-proof reactors. Those haven’t been invented just yet.
Also, we’d need to make them impossible to open and impossible to remove without cutting the ship in half.
Re:Electric Ship Batteries Promise Compact, Cooler Power
by nradov on Thursday November 12, 2026 @06:17PM
(#50475807)
So in other words, we'd need magic.
Re:Electric Ship Batteries Promise Compact, Cooler Power
by 0cf8612b2e1e on Thursday November 12, 2026 @05:34PM
(#50475347)
It has only been two years since the Baltimore bridge was destroyed by that container ship. Had known faulty maintenance, but they kept operating. Now the rest of us have to pay $5 billion to replace the bridge, plus whatever economic damage was done to surrounding industries.
Re:Electric Ship Batteries Promise Compact, Cooler Power
by rbanffy on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:52PM
(#50474091)
We could find a way to make the reactor so integral to the ship and the fuel so integral to the reactor it’d be almost impossible to remove either. We can compound that with fuel cycles with materials less useful for making bombs.
Regulation is not always bad.