News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Orchestrator. Parent comment

Re:Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Orchestrator by pietz on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:01PM (#50473339)
The only reason to do this is to save usage on the subscription. but because the value for money is so terrible in antigravity, you’re better off just using Claude Opus or GPT Sol for everything.

I’m glad Google is kinda back, but today there’s no reason to code with Gemini.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Orchestrator by vrosas on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:12PM (#50473466)
FWIW I've found the complete opposite to be true, and have gone claude->chatgpt->gemini over the past few months.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Orchestrator by imafish on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:25PM (#50473692)
Why?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Orchestrator by engineer_22 on Thursday November 12, 2026 @03:51PM (#50474087)
Im slowly migrating more of my work to Gemini too, Gemini is a workhorse now, 1M context is huge and their reasoning took a huge leap with Argon. I'm not in software, I'm in physical engineering, and where Claude is unpredictable w.r.t. engineering risk, Gemini is steady, measured. That's been my perception, anyway.
[ Parent | on HN ]