Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining card

Re:Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining ... by gwbas1c on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:33AM (#50453923)

> In a properly secured design, a blown fuse should always induce a more restrictive state, because a blown fuse cannot be unblown in an economically feasible way.

I disagree: If there's any risk that the fuse will blow with normal usage, then a blown fuse means a defective product.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining ... by bluGill on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @09:43AM (#50454050)

These are not safety fuses. They will never, in normal use, blow. These are fuses used only in a logic circuit. There is a way that the factory can make the fuse blow and then the circuit code or whatever can check is that fuse blowing and if so it will not do something.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Using voltage glitching to unleash the A100 in my mining ... by cowlevel on Wednesday November 11, 2026 @04:50PM (#50459175)

"fuse" here refers to one-time-programmable memory, not to a safety current limiting device

[ Parent | on HN ]