News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by bottlepalm on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:25PM (#50445024)
Funny how everyone said Starlink would fail, that it couldn't be done. Elon took the risk and it's so successful that you want to reward someone else for achieving it.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by wewtyflakes on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:31PM (#50445103)
I think the other poster just does not want to support the dude (take your pick of reasons); that's the end of the story and that's fine; you don't need to invent stories around them just to get yourself mad.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by bottlepalm on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:33PM (#50445150)
Oh in that case there are lots of options, such as Viasat and Hughesnet.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by yed on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:34PM (#50445160)
Did they? I don't recall any significant voices saying it couldn't be done. Mostly doubts about the commercial and financial viability, but that comes with every venture not just Elon's.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by bottlepalm on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:44PM (#50445307)
They sure did. They said it wasn't possible/economically feasible to launch that many times. Reusability still wasn't a thing, and people here said that wasn't possible as well. They said even 600 sats would be too many. That everyone that had tried satellite constellations before had gone bankrupt, which was true. The deck was stacked against SpaceX. Everyone thought Elon was lying as usual. That he was trying to pump up the valuation for false promises.

Hindsight is now 20/20 that Starlink is a huge success. I guess all you guys forgot and not think that the success of Starlink was obvious all along. Bitcoin and TypeScript are also things I remember HN being dismissive of at first that have both been very successful since.

Re:Starlink Mini 2 by jmull on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:36PM (#50445186)
Whether people want to do business with Elon Musk seems entirely separate from whether some people in the past were able to correctly predict the success of Starlink.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by tootie on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:40PM (#50445241)
Who said it couldn't be done? I think the confusion has been over how viable of a business it would be which is a surprise. Also Elon has doubled down on being reprehensible.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by origini on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:43PM (#50445295)
I do not remember anyone saying Starlink would fail.

I really really despite Elon Musk for plenty of things but i don't think Space-X is not successful, i just think its not worth its share price.

But i'm for sure not liking that one person can just decide to put stuff into our space and disrupt research and my view without paying for it somehow.

And the biggest issue ish Elon Musks behaviour: he is for sure no one who would take something like atmospheric poisening serious until its too late or someone forced him to do so.

Re:Starlink Mini 2 by bottlepalm on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:47PM (#50445355)
Everyone did because Iridium and Teledesic went bankrupt attempting it. To the geniuses here, global satellite constellations had been tried and failed multiple times. Elon was a con-man only putting it out there to pump up the valuation for investors. Sound familiar? Same with his crazy charlatan act of claiming rockets could be made reusable. The users of HN were smarter than that.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by origini on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @03:13PM (#50445675)
Nope not ringing any bell.
Re:Starlink Mini 2 by runarberg on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @02:49PM (#50445379)
[delayed]