News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember by djacksondev on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:39PM (#50435007)
When Muse models first started coming out I was pretty excited that Meta models were competitive again based on the benchmarks but after trying them out it feels like Meta is making benchmaxxed models that are exciting on bench cards but not really useful in real world scenarios.

To me that is the main problem with Muse models whether it's Spark, Wonder or Ember. While it reads as frontier on benchmarks it really isn't.

This is evident when you compare Dots and Muse the products as well. The model quality is clearly still far behind.

Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember by DetroitThrow on Monday November 09, 2026 @10:28PM (#50435705)
It's harder to benchmax frontiercode than other coding and math benchmarks, and it's interesting to see the model fall apart there
Re:Our Smallest, Most Efficient Model: Muse Ember by alex0015 on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @01:20AM (#50436738)
Spark was my go-to at work (technical writing and docs site) on a Cursor API plan for a few weeks because of its speed and price. I was happy with it and recommended it. Now sufficiently outclassed by Haiku 5.5 for tasks of that size.