November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial Analysis, Highest So Far

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by djacksondev on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:36PM (#50434979)

To me Fable's role was always as a planner or plan reviewer, rather than something individuals or organizations would use as the primary driver. In that case, I think these improvements seem worthwhile in exchange for the cost? Ideally in that role, you want the best performing model.

Not sure if the current rise means it's cost prohibitive to use in that form too.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by thewhitetulip on Monday November 09, 2026 @09:35PM (#50435390)

Considering tokenmaxxing is over and budgets are getting tightened everywhere, what's the use case for fable? Who will use it? Possibly FAANG? Or firms like Apple who have 200 $ per day budget

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by jpardoe on Tuesday November 10, 2026 @01:53AM (#50436929)

I’ll use it if there’s a complex bug I need solving quickly, or to weigh in on architectural decisions across large multi-plan projects. It’s a tool to reach for but makes no sense as a daily driver.

[ Parent | on HN ]