November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial Analysis, Highest So Far

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by jonas21 on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:37PM (#50433272)

Yes, but that's running at max. Nobody is going to do that unless they want the best possible performance at all cost.

Fable 5.2 at high scores a 62, which is better than anything on the market, except Fable 5.2 at xhigh and max -- and is about a third of the price.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by nathanyz on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:45PM (#50433375)

The model feels bench maxed to me. It is back to Opus and prior Fable behavior of me pointing out constant mistakes, with it apologizing and saying that it should have looked at what I point it to.

The thing is, all of these pointers are in the CLAUDE.md file, so it just ignored instructions because it thought it was smarter than the world and didn't need them. It feels really arrogant is how I would describe it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by Spivak on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:26PM (#50433840)

You can't argue with the sci-fi angle of an even fancy simulacrum of intelligence beyond a certain level naturally precipitates condescension.

[ Parent | on HN ]