November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial Analysis, Highest So Far

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by jrflo on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:02PM (#50432891)

The choice of X-axis maximum and Y-axis maximum dictates the cutoff point of the quadrant. With a maximum of $80 per task, the quadrant is $3.1 and lower. If some new model gets released and costs more than $80 per task, the "most attractive" cutoff moves up from $3.1 since they have to move the X-axis max. It's completely arbitrary.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by StevenWaterman on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:14PM (#50433022)

It's not saying that being inside that quadrant is a hard cut-off it's just illustrating the direction of the pareto frontier

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by jrflo on Monday November 09, 2026 @07:12PM (#50434324)

It is suggesting a hard cutoff since it says "most" attractive, a superlative, instead of "more" attractive. And it is not pareto optimal, because if the models get really good and are scoring 10x more for 10x cheaper that green region will no longer be pareto optimal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by StevenWaterman on Monday November 09, 2026 @07:23PM (#50434427)

Of the 4 quadrants it is the most attractive

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An... by jrflo on Monday November 09, 2026 @08:41PM (#50435019)

I suppose you’re not wrong lol

[ Parent | on HN ]