Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An...
by coderenegade on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:06PM
(#50432933)
Reminds me a lot of the race for clock speed when I was a kid. We just took it for granted that it was going to keep increasing, but CPUs sat at roughly 1-2GHz for a long time, or at least that's how it seemed. The slowdown and pause was fairly noticeable. The current release cadence is unsustainable. It might be that we're getting close to the AI equivalent of 1-2GHz CPUs, and it takes years of incremental progress to push further.
Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An...
by asadotzler on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:30PM
(#50433883)
When AMD won the race to 1 GHz, the GHz race slowed and Intel and AMD began focusing more on multi-core. Some chips continued to push the boundaries up to several GHz, some quite higher with specialty cooling. But multi-core was the far better strategy.
Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An...
by NonHyloMorph on Monday November 09, 2026 @07:33PM
(#50434510)
Clock speed went up single core till at least 3GHz before multicore became a thing as far as i remember.
Re:November 2026 Claude Fable 5.2 Scores 65 on Artificial An...
by yieldcrv on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:26PM
(#50433833)
This is why I shied away from management roles
In the JS ecosystem 6 months always meant breaking changes, without incremental updates everything would be basically like a full port
Pretending like I did “20% hands on coding” just doesn’t cut it, even the reality is having no idea what’s going on anymore
The crypto space moved that fast as well
And AI keeps the same cadence
It’s more important for me to be able to build
I had to remind them 4.6 only came out February this year. In a normal world 4.6 is a newer model! A model 6 months old is seen as ancient!