News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by jatora on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:17PM (#50430277)
Anecdotes and conspiracies and mass hysteria abound imo. And probably a bit of astroturfing from competitors. Models are not deterministic, nor are your projects. I work on code constantly for years - and across every anthropic and openai model people claim the same thing - yet I've never experienced this degredation, not even one hint of it. I would be acutely aware of it.

Variable token usage? Sure. To be expected in non-deterministic systems like these.

Distinct increase in errors and issues? Never. Not within a single model's lifespan have I ever experienced this.

And this whole notion of the A/B testing of performance/usage is completely ridiculous. There is zero evidence it has anything to do with performance. There are a trillion things to A/B test besides things that hamstring groups of users, so this is just being used to confirm the bias of people already caught up in these "theories."

I await any realistic indication.

Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by wat10000 on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:53PM (#50430952)
Perhaps most importantly, human bias is not deterministic either. Everything seems consistent with people getting excited by the hype (or just the novelty) when a new model is released, and then coming back to reality a little while later.

If they're messing with models like this, surely they'd at least occasionally make a tweak that improves intelligence rather than degrading it. But I never see anyone say Model 4.2 got smarter a week ago or whatever.