News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by actionfromafar on Monday November 09, 2026 @07:23AM (#50424628)
Every hour baby-sitting a local model can be extremely expensive in billable hours.
Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by techmunky on Monday November 09, 2026 @12:54PM (#50428953)
Is there a model that doesn't need babysitting? Half my day is spent untangling BS that Claude and Codex hallucinate. Particularly around hallucinated product requirements. Its still faster than hand-writing code but only just. I'm seriously considering just going back to the early copilot days where I lead coding and just let it try to auto-correct. That was a great balance of AI enhancing my speed and workflows without removing any confidence in what was being shipped.
Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by jatora on Monday November 09, 2026 @01:53PM (#50429858)
give your models a more organized context/harness if they are hallucinating product requirements... and I'm not talking about some hulking context framework. just organize your documentation in a canonical way. This product requirements hallucination is something that would bite me constantly if...they ever actually hallucinated them (and they don't, ever). This is most certainly user error.
Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by jesse_dot_id on Monday November 09, 2026 @05:45PM (#50433377)
You're untangling hallucinated BS from Opus 5.5/Fable?
Re:Is Opus 5.5 nerfed? Thinking patterns changed on November 3 by julianlam on Monday November 09, 2026 @02:07PM (#50430100)
We are literally in this thread because so-called frontier SOTA Claude models are shitting the bed and require babysitting. So this argument is essentially moot.