I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by jrflowers on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:31AM (#50422724)

> Is there any evidence that you yourself are more than a 'next action predictor with a multi-modal context window'?

I love the age of LLMs because people will post stuff like “the fact that I absolutely, unqualifiedly, fundamentally do not understand two separate things indicates that I understand at least one and maybe even both of them more than you do“ and then do that cool move where they pretend they were gonna high five you but don’t

it is a golden age of Posting

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by roncesvalles on Monday November 09, 2026 @03:47AM (#50422858)

It's because of the proliferation of "insight-posting" - people thinking their little insightful "aha" thoughts are unique or have any kind of value at all.

However, insight born of knowledge ignorance is worthless. I really don't care for your great insight about nuclear fusion if you're not a nuclear engineer or physicist working on nuclear fusion, because your insight is just a hypothesis in the void that is your ignorance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by TonyStr on Monday November 09, 2026 @06:30AM (#50424152)

Is your post any better? You attack GP's character without addressing any of his arguments. You could have provided evidence for why you think his speculation is wrong, or tried to point out how his logic falls apart.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by jrflowers on Monday November 09, 2026 @01:56PM (#50429896)

> You attack GP's character

I said the move was cool ???

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I'm Not Convinced the AI Bubble Exists by mckirk on Monday November 09, 2026 @12:36PM (#50428722)

I'm not even sure which part of my post you object to, or why

[ Parent | on HN ]