We have a sitting president who freely shares state secrets with dictators upon request. This seems rather high effort when they could’ve just asked nicely no? </s>

Is whataboutism really necessary?

the </s> is for sarcasm..

It isn't whataboutism if it's directly relevant to the point at hand (as opposed to attempting to distract from it). The question posed effectively amounted to "why is this particularly noteworthy compared to everything else of a vaguely similar nature that's been going on".

I know you are trying to make some point for your political team but if you look up what a fiduciary is then you will see why this would be a good thing and a way to avoid other legal issues. But I know, OMB and all that!

[delayed]

The US government has known she was a spy due to CIA and hasn't acted till now it's in the press.

So how much of a security issue is there if the government hasn't cared so far?