News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The End of AI Frontiers by pyrale on Saturday November 07, 2026 @04:21PM (#50408178)
> CS is a little bit of an exception because the capital cost of basic research isn’t, proportionally, as high, and because the promise-to-product path is often short enough that having done the basic work in house can be a meaningful advantage in getting to market first (though, see Google on much of modern AI for a counterexample)

...And because they have monopoly money. Basically, research labs are usually vanity spending for corporations with too much money. Xerox parc was funded by a monopoly. Bell labs was funded by a monopoly. Google funds its moonshots with its monopoly.

Re:The End of AI Frontiers by robotresearcher on Saturday November 07, 2026 @06:23PM (#50409008)
Bell and Xerox became powerful because they invented game-changing technologies. They were fundamentally research-based organizations from the start.