News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by Hasz on Friday November 06, 2026 @11:28AM (#50394523)
I worked there for a couple years. IMO, the hiring process holds Canonical back from scaling like a typical tech co, but they probably don't want to. It also attracts a very specific type of person; everyone I personally worked with was very bright and capable.

IME, because of pay, they have a hard time retaining "senior" talent, eg Nvidia, Chainguard, Amutable, Lambda, etc etc etc all have lots and lots of senior+ Canonical engineers. Especially in the age of AI, I think this is a "people-strategy" mistake.

The application process is very long and you absolutely lose great candidates because of it. Salaries are not US-tech competitive, but absolutely are Central/South America and Europe competitive. Lots of great Brazilian and Polish engineers, for example.

Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by ndiddy on Friday November 06, 2026 @12:17PM (#50395267)
> It also attracts a very specific type of person; everyone I personally worked with was very bright and capable.

How well did you and your colleagues do at math in high school?

Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by queenkjuul on Friday November 06, 2026 @03:38PM (#50398154)
Well if they work at canonical we know they did very well
Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by nish__ on Friday November 06, 2026 @12:24PM (#50395363)
If they're so bright and capable why can't they patch their OS?
Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by throwaway27448 on Friday November 06, 2026 @12:33PM (#50395491)
[delayed]
Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by throw-the-towel on Friday November 06, 2026 @12:38PM (#50395561)
I wonder why these bright abd capable people didn't join a company that actually pays reasonably.
Re:Ask HN: What in the world is taking Ubuntu so long? by rcxdude on Friday November 06, 2026 @07:34PM (#50400421)
>I wonder why these bright abd capable people didn't join a company that actually pays reasonably.

Sounds like they do when they get the chance. I've worked for a company that didn't have quite as crazy a hiring process but they had the same basic profile - very good at hiring for potential in juniors, but underpaid for the ability they wanted. As a result they really struggle to hire seniors and are often a stepping stone to a better paid position. They do manage to keep some people until retirement, though (a very bimodal distribution - generally either brilliant but don't care to work anywhere else, or utterly useless and can't get a job anywhere else)