I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious

Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious by estearum on Friday November 06, 2026 @07:56AM (#50391777)

This doesn't even address the direct point. The question is how any of this is fundamentally different (difference in type and not just of "scale") from how human cognition works.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious by datsci_est_2015 on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:34AM (#50392109)

Well, I've addressed it implicitly. Every human collects different context by living one of 8.3 billion+ unique lives. We don't have 8.3 billion+ different LLMs. The only way to simulate that is to perform a random walk through the compressed language-based knowledge storage by injecting random context.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious by pixl97 on Saturday November 07, 2026 @05:34PM (#50408686)

So all you're saying is we need log term context in LLMs and then we could have 'trillion' of unique LLM paths.

If that's the only limitation that you're putting forward than LLMs have already won over humans. If you're not hoping for some quantum level limitations then it's already over for us.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious by Diti on Saturday November 07, 2026 @02:18AM (#50402388)

The answer is here: [LLMs can’t jump].

[LLMs can’t jump]: https://openreview.net/forum?id=klU4737opt

[ Parent | on HN ]