News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dutch 'idealist' bank ASN blocks non-Google Android, incl... by account42 on Friday November 06, 2026 @06:21AM (#50390985)
It's wansn't a mistake, it was a deliberate attack on the user, i.e. malware.
Re:Dutch 'idealist' bank ASN blocks non-Google Android, incl... by shevy-java on Friday November 06, 2026 @06:54AM (#50391283)
It is both.

I also consider restrictions against open source to be malicious acts - hence also malware, such as by banks and other companies. Or, worse, government agencies. In a local medical university in central Europe, for instance, we are required to either have a Google account or a Microsoft account - usually the latter, to access emails.

All paid by the taxpayers ...

Re:Dutch 'idealist' bank ASN blocks non-Google Android, incl... by Gigachad on Friday November 06, 2026 @07:08AM (#50391414)
More it was the banks were made liable for stolen funds. So they responded by making funds harder to steal.

Do you really think banks care about you installing custom themes or whatever? They only care because the cracked Spotify app also has malware bundled on the side which uses the new root access to break the app sandboxes.

Re:Dutch 'idealist' bank ASN blocks non-Google Android, incl... by UqWBcuFx6NV4r on Friday November 06, 2026 @07:55AM (#50391770)
Yeah, you’re right man. The bank is just hell bent on stopping you from using GrapheneOS just because they’re in the pocket of Big Google or whatever. It’s gotta be malice. It’s not about liability at all.
Re:Dutch 'idealist' bank ASN blocks non-Google Android, incl... by Zak on Friday November 06, 2026 @08:38AM (#50392146)
I'm convinced the Amazon Fire Phone was the motivation for SafetyNet.

The Fire Phone was a midrange Android phone from 2014 preloaded with Amazon's app store and services instead of Google's. It failed on its own merits, but I think Google got scared someone else would do a better job. The barrier to entry is a lot higher if most people can't use their banking app on it.