Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by johnnudd on Friday November 06, 2026 @04:14AM
(#50390003)
I have a PhD and Opus 5.5 came up with a novel solution to solve a problem in my area of research that I, and other experts in the field, had been unable to. This was from very general prompting it to find improvements over published methods.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by suddenlybananas on Friday November 06, 2026 @05:32AM
(#50390619)
What was it?
Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by johnnudd on Friday November 06, 2026 @09:30AM
(#50392725)
It came up with a way to efficiently evaluate the reliability of certain types of complex system using generating functions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generating_function) to split the computation, which was far to large to solve with existing methods, into many embarrassingly parallel smaller problems and then reduce it back to a final result. The solution involved several distinct new ideas for it to work, really mind-blowing it was able to come up with it. The other cool thing was that, in the process and unprompted, it implemented code to validate and benchmark against existing approaches and known results just from the pdfs of the published papers (none of which gave reference implementations). In my research it would often take weeks just to replicate a single result from a paper.
Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by suddenlybananas on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:10AM
(#50393268)
Sounds interesting but very vague!
Re:I struggle to believe that AI R&D is ingenious
by johnnudd on Friday November 06, 2026 @04:06PM
(#50398550)
Perhaps but I have no incentive to write all the details here.