suddenlybananas

This goes against the bitter lesson I think.

Does asking an LLM to not use tools guarantee it doesn't use tools?

And this is considered really creepy and weird by many people.

Are you being sarcastic? I genuinely cannot tell.

I don't think you understand the conversation that these mathematicians are having. They are debating what to do as mathematicians with regards to math; not how society should handle a hypothetical AI god. I also don't think they necessarily believe in the AI god the way that you do.

Who made the coding error?

what if the alternative is much cheaper?

Why do you think we pay historians or english professors?

Look, if we were worried about human extinction, the frontier-labs should simply stop. They won't though.

Any interesting examples of one?

It's certainly not the case with writing.

I didn't say it was impossible, I said if it were true there would be nothing to do and thus no point in writing about that potentiality. It's sort of like writing about what mathematics should do if there was a thermonuclear war that wiped out all of civilisation.

Because if you assume there is going to be an AI-god that can do everything better than us, there's nothing to really do. Like really, what do you want these people to write? "Well, math for humans is over as well as all intellectual activity, better just jerk off watching AI-generated hentai all day until I die"

I thought the platonic representation hypothesis was much more ambitious: wasn't it supposed to apply for any model across modalities (e.g. including human minds), rather than just the same model but with different modalities? I'll have to actually read the paper but I suspect there to be very strong assumptions which defeat the interesting aspects of the platonic representation hypothesis.

:(

You seem completely joyless.

Well, if the point is to have something that works well and follows the standard, he shouldn't have done anything at all and just use what was already made.

and if he was living in the other states?

Shhh you can't say anything anti-hype here.

You can't generalize and say that 1 is better than 2, it depends entirely on what you are developing, for whom and for what purpose. For a one-off dumb thing for a few people 1 is fine, for anything at scale, 2 is likely better.

Just because something is completely pointless and uninteresting doesn't mean it's not knowledge. It's more or less just justified true belief (with some caveats)

What on earth is that argument?

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

I'd be curious to know what makes some games easier than others to decompile for models? Besides just how complicated the game is.

Persian doesn't have gender and Iran is famously not patriarchal at all.

>"How often are people paying at least $600 annually for something AI can help them do instead"

Not that often.

https://github.com/storytold/photocraft/issues?q=is%3Aissue+... It's also a buggy mess

If we end up having a centrally planned economy but controlled by billionaires instead of the proletariat, it would be quite upsetting.

If you ate up that 12T dollars on AI, the economy would collapse and whoosh would go the 12T dollars.

How often are you having a plumber or mechanic come?