News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Introducing Pangram Image 1.0. Parent comment

Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0 by JacobAsmuth on Thursday November 05, 2026 @06:57PM (#50386317)
You should look at the data. Look at the actual measurements on the accuracy of Pangram's V4 detection model. Try to fool it. It's not easy at all.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0 by zeroonetwothree on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:47PM (#50386727)
It’s often inaccurate with short text. For example it has flagged text I wrote by hand with no AI input or editing.

But I agree it’s good for longer text of 1000+ words.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing Pangram Image 1.0 by fxwin on Friday November 06, 2026 @02:56AM (#50389422)
> For example it has flagged text I wrote by hand with no AI input or editing.

Do you mind providing that example?

[ Parent | on HN ]