News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sshole. Parent comment

Re:Sshole by oneeyedpigeon on Thursday November 05, 2026 @08:41AM (#50378950)
I thought it was a great write up. It did feel a bit AI-coded, but whether it actually was or not, it's still a good bit of work imo.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by phyzome on Thursday November 05, 2026 @08:47AM (#50379017)
I dunno, there were some strange discrepancies in the explanation (and captions). Didn't really hang together.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by xnorswap on Thursday November 05, 2026 @08:55AM (#50379092)
It would be weird to spend this much effort doing the site by hand, for a bug that the author says was found by a swarm of agents.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by user43928 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:20AM (#50379386)
Looks good overall, but I was wondering if eg. "the timer learns nothing" and "no X, no Y, no Z" was slop rather than a deliberate choice.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by fwip on Thursday November 05, 2026 @02:16PM (#50383164)
Slop, no question. There's at least 10 Claudisms on the page, and I'm not that good at smelling them. Some of the sentences might have been human-written.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sshole by aphysically on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:26PM (#50387379)
fwiw pangram believes the text is AI as well
[ Parent | on HN ]