> I am already using a bagger, while you are arguing for electric shovels.
This demonstrates that you continue to misunderstand the analogy.
Let's speak plainly. Someone who attempts to use LLMs to generate assembly directly will be outcompeted by someone who uses LLMs to generate code in a high-level language, which then uses an ordinary compiler to generate assembly. The value of a high-level language is that it defines a more constrained abstract machine than the machine that a CPU represents, which both humans and LLMs alike benefit from.
In case you answer there don't fit the same purpose, there are tiny baggers that replace shovels altogether.