Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by raincole on Thursday November 05, 2026 @03:58AM
(#50376865)
The problem is most drivers believe they are above average drivers.
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by kleiba2 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @04:05AM
(#50376921)
And almost all of them could be correct.
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by jonplackett on Thursday November 05, 2026 @04:12AM
(#50376959)
At least 49.999 percent of them anyway
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by kleiba2 on Thursday November 05, 2026 @05:40AM
(#50377571)
Are you sure?
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by hxorr on Friday November 06, 2026 @10:40PM
(#50401412)
You are confusing mean and median
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by AdamN on Friday November 06, 2026 @05:14AM
(#50390473)
Lake Wobegon, where all the children are above average :-)
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by dbdr on Thursday November 05, 2026 @04:05AM
(#50376913)
I would hope writing C code for the Linux kernel qualifies you as a real C programmer. And yet, here we are. Being good, careful, and extensively reviewed by others helps, but is clearly not enough.
Re:Local privilege escalation vulnerabilities in Linux
by rybosworld on Thursday November 05, 2026 @06:21AM
(#50377853)
> A 'real' C programmer probably is fine .... but that's like 1% of the population of developers outputting C programs.
The idea that there's a small subset of C programmers who can wrangle the language into obeying them perfectly is obviously, a fantasy.
And now you have AI that's learned from the other 99% so nothing's changing anytime soon.