News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by customguy on Thursday November 05, 2026 @12:00AM (#50375394)
> The numbers clearly show the average user does not care about the AI look because they can't really tell the difference between human-gen and AI-gen.

Do you have a link to the numbers that clearly show this?

Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by rafram on Thursday November 05, 2026 @12:03AM (#50375419)
The numbers of AI posters/signs/ads I see on the street…
Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by customguy on Thursday November 05, 2026 @03:15AM (#50376533)
So nothing at all. Most people would notice the difference between no ads everywhere, and ads everywhere, would prefer no ads, and still there are ads. That there are ads tells us nothing about people.
Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by samuria on Thursday November 05, 2026 @06:12AM (#50377791)
Do you need statistical numbers for every information you receive? I don’t have any numbers to show you besides the fact that everyone I have spoken to in the last 6 months knows how to generate an image on ChatGPT. I work in the construction industry, and 100% of the companies I deal with have at some point posted an AI-generated poster on their social media, or created their flyers and business cards. YMMV.
Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by nozzlegear on Thursday November 05, 2026 @09:51AM (#50379802)
[delayed]
Re:Introducing Images 2.6 by customguy on Thursday November 05, 2026 @11:35AM (#50381207)
Well, you said "the numbers show". But anyway, not being able to tell the difference and not caring is very different from "having tried it at some point".

> everyone I have spoken to in the last 6 months knows how to generate an image on ChatGPT.

That goes without saying. If you can speak to them, if they have a pulse, they can "generate an image". A cat walking over a keyboard can generate an image. That is the lowest bar ever.