You literally asked for a source and when provide by a human it was not enough? Maybe you should rather engage with AI completely then?

It was enough and I appreciated it with the context, and conversation ensued. Not sure why I was scolded for doing so, that's what I meant by being able to have the conversation with AI - this whole interaction is defunct if we're going by the logic that it could be had another way.. I didn't want to go research it myself, I wanted to know where my peers are sourcing this novel-to-me information from.

Maybe the reaction stems from the low effort? "source?" Personally, sometimes I find a short command like this in a discussion forum insulting to my effort. Or maybe it's just that I still like sentences, and others are using text message conversational forms. idk. wtf.

For me it stems from "I could have this entire conversation with ai too."