Re:Conductor Is Joining Meta
by BowBun on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @01:52PM
(#50369909)
Gah this sucks! Conductor is my main development tool. Now I'm forced to look for alternatives. Why can't they open source it?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Conductor Is Joining Meta
by freedomben on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @02:05PM
(#50370073)
Over the years I've gotten extremely conservative with adopting any new tooling into my workflow, for exactly reasons like this.
With labs spending their fundings left and right and vibe-coding, it's absolutely irresponsible to adopt anything less than 18 months old.
Re:Conductor Is Joining Meta
by redanddead on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:24PM
(#50372342)
Trusts suck
They ruin innovation top down and bottom up at the same time
If you’re looking for an open-source alternative, I’m the creator of woltspace [0], which is a way of coordinating your wolts (coding agents) by letting them talk to each other and giving them a lodge on your machine.
I built it for myself as a dev who loves tmux and vim and who was very unsatisfied with the typical agent orchestration experience. You should check it out! The biggest advantage is you bring your coding agents to woltspace, not the other way around.
Not tried it yet but DeltaDB from ZED (and ZED editor more generally) could cover it for you and they are open source.
I switched to paseo.sh several months ago. It's just as good if not better.
Re:Conductor Is Joining Meta
by Philip-J-Fry on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @02:30PM
(#50370395)
Western AI giants have hundreds of billions of dollars to make back in a world where China is releasing open source tooling and open weights models. How else does they make their money back other than finding _something_ proprietary to sell.