Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by purplemantis on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @01:24PM
(#50369531)
3T parameters! I've been really impressed with Kimi's coding performance. It's replaced a lot of my Claude Code workflows, which just got way too expensive. Wonder how big Fable and Opus are in comparison.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by thway15269037 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @04:22PM
(#50371746)
Chinese labs seem to think that fable/mythos is a 10T+ model, and target that amount of parameters with next iteration of qwen/kimi/ds/glm. Proves nothing tho.
With common use of n-gram tables, comparing "params" count has gotten harder. Those are exceptionally sparse and light on compute, way beyond even the sparsest MoE experts. You could host them on a slow spinning disk and still have a viable local inference platform.
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by thway15269037 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:35PM
(#50372438)
So that's why I can't buy a replacement 16TB HDD for less than a 1000$ when three years ago I bought them for 229$ a pop.
I wondered why do they even need slow HDDs, like, do they store training data on them? User chats? Do they assemble crazy 12-way stripes for fast speed? Do they store what, failed attempts?
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by selectodude on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:41PM
(#50372502)
I think that’s just because hoovering up the entire worlds worth of data and saving it to a RAID multiplied by every frontier lab is a lot of fucking hard drives.
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by NoidMonsense on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:39AM
(#50378397)
I bought one used a couple months ago for $350 on serverpartdeals.