Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by zozbot234 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @04:39PM
(#50371939)
With common use of n-gram tables, comparing "params" count has gotten harder. Those are exceptionally sparse and light on compute, way beyond even the sparsest MoE experts. You could host them on a slow spinning disk and still have a viable local inference platform.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by thway15269037 on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:35PM
(#50372438)
So that's why I can't buy a replacement 16TB HDD for less than a 1000$ when three years ago I bought them for 229$ a pop.
I wondered why do they even need slow HDDs, like, do they store training data on them? User chats? Do they assemble crazy 12-way stripes for fast speed? Do they store what, failed attempts?
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by selectodude on Wednesday November 04, 2026 @05:41PM
(#50372502)
I think that’s just because hoovering up the entire worlds worth of data and saving it to a RAID multiplied by every frontier lab is a lot of fucking hard drives.
Re:Kimi K3.1 Pro weights out
by NoidMonsense on Thursday November 05, 2026 @07:39AM
(#50378397)
I bought one used a couple months ago for $350 on serverpartdeals.