As someone committed to transdisciplinary work, I think the tech also really supports this - i can do lit reviews on topics and cross-reference much more easily, which gives me more time for reading and thinking (both of which are also falling out of fashion, but that's another story)

I packed the thought into "consider if your vision is really distinct enough": make it better, make it weird, or make it recreationally (i.e. by hand). Make it opinionated, in Minecraft, whatever, but give it at least some new substance.

It's also fine to do Hacker Tube or Hacker Times (it's really not about this specific instance) for the 100th time, but if nothing else distinguishes it from the others than "I wanted to have one too", maybe it's not the curiosity-inspiring thing to share on HN we should strive for.

My specific examples aren't listed, but the guidelines on what to submit support my point I think:

> If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

In reality it's just some false belief they have.

There is no guarantee that the first implementation of the idea will be the first to receive reception.

Also it's perfectly fine to have someone post a duplicate implementation of an idea and get no reception as well.