News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proton's CEO Cancels AI 'Re-Interviews' by mcmcmc on Friday October 30, 2026 @02:39PM (#50308338)
> The thing with tech products is they could just leave and start another company.

This is such a cop out response. They still need funding, and infrastructure, and to build up an entire customer base who presumably they would need to bribe with free service at a loss in order to attract anyone new. Who’s gonna fund that when there’s a known market ceiling for the service that’s already been captured? We’re not in ZIRP anymore

Re:Proton's CEO Cancels AI 'Re-Interviews' by iAMkenough on Friday October 30, 2026 @02:56PM (#50308563)
> There’s investors out there that would support Proton’s original engineers to fulfill Proton’s original mission

Compromising on pentesting and security reviews is not in line with their original mission. Their customer base (including employees) knows this.

Re:Proton's CEO Cancels AI 'Re-Interviews' by mcmcmc on Friday October 30, 2026 @03:01PM (#50308635)
How much of the customer base actually follows their internal politics and dev processes?
Re:Proton's CEO Cancels AI 'Re-Interviews' by iAMkenough on Friday October 30, 2026 @09:20PM (#50312299)
As a guess? The same amount of customers that left Gmail for Proton vs. those that signed up for Proton without ever having a Gmail account.

I’d wager that most of their current customers have left something else to sign up for Proton in the first place, because of the privacy and security offering.

When Proton leadership abandons those values in favor of “move fast, break things, lay off engineers”, their customers are more likely to follow the people that take privacy and security seriously.

The CEO and CTO have made it clear that they want vibe-coded product updates without pentesting before exposing their customers to whatever may happen.

If you bought into Proton for privacy and security, that’s a red flag and a sign to find an alternative.