Re:Investor-owned utilities charge 23% more for electricity ...
by triceratops on Friday October 23, 2026 @11:05AM
(#50210294)
Everything comes up short of the S&P 500.
Utility companies get local monopolies and in exchange their prices are regulated. Consequently they have moderate but stable, essentially guaranteed, returns.
Re:Investor-owned utilities charge 23% more for electricity ...
by lotsofpulp on Saturday October 24, 2026 @07:04AM
(#50220120)
Why would anyone invest in any other equity other than SP500 if they all come up short (assuming your goal is to have USD in the future)?
Re:Investor-owned utilities charge 23% more for electricity ...
by toomuchtodo on Monday November 02, 2026 @01:05PM
(#50340902)
Diversification against concentration risk.
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/concentration-risk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_risk
https://ncua.gov/regulation-supervision/letters-credit-union...
Re:Investor-owned utilities charge 23% more for electricity ...
by cj on Friday October 23, 2026 @11:10AM
(#50210383)
Your goal post for acceptable profit taking for utilities is… the S&P 500?
That makes very little sense.
And stock price is not a measure of profit.
Re:Investor-owned utilities charge 23% more for electricity ...
by lotsofpulp on Saturday October 24, 2026 @07:05AM
(#50220125)
If you are choosing to invest in equities for the long term, why is benchmarking against the lowest risk long term equity investment not sensible?
Although, a 5 year investment term is too short for comparing equity returns for a long term investment.
These are their five year stock gains, with the general market for reference.
Market (SP500): 68%
Market(tech): 89%
XEL: +20%
AEP: +51%
SO: +47%
EIX: -5%
CPK: +2.5%
AQN: -64%
NGG: +30%
NEE: -3.5%
Looks like a pretty bad industry for profits, even stacking the dividend on AEP, it still comes up short of SP500.