News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The compiler was supposed to end programming too by pjmlp on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @03:50PM (#50186613)
But it isn't, anything goes as long the "as if" rule is kept.

For example a JIT compiler can produce completely different kinds of machine code depending on the application data that was processed, and the overall machine workload.

Re:The compiler was supposed to end programming too by Veserv on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @04:01PM (#50186803)
"as if" is what semantically identical means. As I further clarified: "All observable and defined side effects should be identical otherwise you have a compiler bug."

The output program does what the input source code does. The abstraction is a precise translation and non-leaky, it just admits multiple possible internals. That does not make the translation any less precise.

Re:The compiler was supposed to end programming too by pjmlp on Thursday October 22, 2026 @03:22AM (#50192261)
Yes, and just like with human intelligence offshoring projects, if the delivered microservice e.g. always sends the right email content when a notification lands, no one cares about the garbage underneath.