News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Startups are run by founders. Mature companies are run by... by yuhong on Sunday January 06, 2013 @02:40PM (#5017425)
This does not mean they should be, though some of them are hardware companies too.
Re:Startups are run by founders. Mature companies are run by... by rgbrenner on Sunday January 06, 2013 @02:49PM (#5017460)
Flat works at the small size of GitHub and Valve. But I can't think of a single large company that is flat. Where is the evidence that a flat structure even works at the size of these companies?

Just so the comparison is clear:

Microsoft: 94000 employees [0]

GitHub: 140 [1]

In other words, Microsoft is 670x larger. Or GitHub is 0.15% of MS's size.

[0] http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/inside_ms.aspx

[1] http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/github-has-big-drea...

Re:Startups are run by founders. Mature companies are run by... by SatvikBeri on Sunday January 06, 2013 @02:57PM (#5017485)
Gore & Associates is the major counterexample-flat structure, 9,000 employees: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gore_and_Associates
Re:Startups are run by founders. Mature companies are run by... by michaelochurch on Sunday January 06, 2013 @03:04PM (#5017509)
You need coordination and guidance at 94,000 people. You can't have it be totally "flat"; I agree. You need some administration and some conceptual structure and hierarchy is the way humans think.

You don't, however, need managerial extortionists who won't let people seek independent credibility, choose their own projects and teams, or collaborate extra-hierarchically.