Re:Do We Really Need Another Smartphone OS?
by madisp on Sunday January 06, 2013 @01:04PM
(#5017031)
As far as I understand it actually is a fork of Android in the sense that it runs the Android-flavoured Linux kernel.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Do We Really Need Another Smartphone OS?
by ttuominen on Sunday January 06, 2013 @01:09PM
(#5017046)
This, and also Android's overall userspace design is kind of idiosyncratic. I'm sure there are other legitimate designs of a Linux-based mobile OS, which don't rely so heavily on Java and a virtual machine. Ubuntu will be Qt-based, for example. That throws out the possibility to reuse the Android application framework.
Re:Do We Really Need Another Smartphone OS?
by trimbo on Sunday January 06, 2013 @01:24PM
(#5017092)
Ok, but there's nothing that prevents them from implementing QT on Android using the NDK. You don't have to throw out all application compatibility to achieve something like this.
Re:Do We Really Need Another Smartphone OS?
by madisp on Sunday January 06, 2013 @01:43PM
(#5017186)
If I remember correctly then it can also run Android apps in the same WM together with other apps. It actually shouldn't be too hard to replace Android's WindowManager with some other implementation (say, QT-based) due to the nature of Binder (Android's IPC mechanism).
Re:Do We Really Need Another Smartphone OS?
by ricardobeat on Sunday January 06, 2013 @01:37PM
(#5017169)
Haven't they merged the "android kernel" into the linux kernel recently?
Re:Do We Really Need Another Smartphone OS?
by ttuominen on Sunday January 06, 2013 @02:00PM
(#5017265)
Many features, not all: https://lwn.net/Articles/514901/