News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There's never been a better time to go into math (by: 3bl... by culi on Monday October 19, 2026 @12:27PM (#50154385)
> and tells him we can make bags 50 times better than you at 1/tenth the price

I don't know where people get this idea that technological advancements always bring quality improvements alongside the price cuts. The reality is almost always a trade off. Before nails, there were rich traditions of nail-less architecture in Europe, Japan, and elsewhere. These buildings are more resilient to disasters, significantly less liable to rot, are usually built so that modular pieces can be taken out and replaced without taking the whole building down, and have a whole host of other benefits.

We switched to nails not because of a quality increase but because a massive unignorable price decrease and ability to scale.

Today, if you have the money for it, you are probably looking for that leather workman to make you your handbag. It is of much higher quality than anything you can get from any currently existing factory.

Re:There's never been a better time to go into math (by: 3bl... by fsflover on Tuesday October 20, 2026 @03:37AM (#50162580)
> I don't know where people get this idea that technological advancements always bring quality improvements alongside the price cuts.

Computers, phones, cars - all of this fits this idea.

Re:There's never been a better time to go into math (by: 3bl... by culi on Tuesday October 20, 2026 @01:55PM (#50170120)
Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point but all of those seem like examples of my own point. They all have major downsides/tradeoffs. Cars being the most obvious on the list of downsides. The massive environmental cost, the fact that 2% of the land area of the US is paved so that cars could work, the smog and pollution, etc.

If it were true that cars were a complete improvement and cheaper then we wouldn't have bikes anymore. All technologies have tradeoffs

Re:There's never been a better time to go into math (by: 3bl... by fsflover on Sunday October 25, 2026 @04:10PM (#50235576)
I don't see how any of these items prove your point.

> Cars being the most obvious on the list of downsides. The massive environmental cost

Newer cars require far less resources for construction and operation.

> the fact that 2% of the land area of the US is paved so that cars could work

Harmful governmental policies forcing people to use cars everywhere have nothing to do with the fact that progress makes cars more efficient.