Re:Maybe There Was an Egg Cartel After All
by SoftTalker on Monday October 19, 2026 @12:47PM
(#50154650)
Yes, non-binding bids that are not actual sales should not signal anything.
Re:Maybe There Was an Egg Cartel After All
by nekusar on Monday October 19, 2026 @01:06PM
(#50154940)
> This seems like a system tailor-made for collision. It seems like the consumer protection agency should force changes. Too bad they've been made toothless.
Elections have consequences. This is one of them.
Re:Maybe There Was an Egg Cartel After All
by jpadkins on Monday October 19, 2026 @01:23PM
(#50155197)
That's correct. We are reading about this story because of the prioritizations of the current administration.
Re:Maybe There Was an Egg Cartel After All
by sokka_h2otribe on Monday October 19, 2026 @02:02PM
(#50155705)
Circumventing political parties, Matt Stoller is where I learned about this story:
Re:Maybe There Was an Egg Cartel After All
by alyeska2 on Monday October 19, 2026 @02:21PM
(#50155937)
It's a system that is vulnerable to fraud, which is why it's good to have regulators who go after fraudulent actors.
It's a perfectly fine system if the egg producers are using it genuinely, it's only a problem when they start submitting fraudulent bids to accomplish illegal market manipulation.
> they had the ability to create the illusion of [consumer demand] through bids on the surplus exchange for purchases they had no intent of completing
This seems like a system tailor-made for collision. It seems like the consumer protection agency should force changes. Too bad they've been made toothless.