Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by Betelbuddy on Sunday October 18, 2026 @08:16AM
(#50140418)
>> It's a well-known problem with access journalism.
Yes, CNBC is a prime example :-)
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by bookofjoe on Sunday October 18, 2026 @10:26AM
(#50141396)
Having followed your comments here for years, I was shocked to read that you got Theranos tests. From the get-go, long before the WSJ exposé, it was apparent to me this was a complete fraud. I based my thinking on long experience (38 years) drawing blood for tests.
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by idiotsecant on Sunday October 18, 2026 @10:32AM
(#50141438)
Do you ask the doctor to stop so you can discuss which vendor will be recieving test materials prior to blood draw?
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by bookofjoe on Sunday October 18, 2026 @10:52AM
(#50141604)
I would NEVER patronize a doctor who sent my blood to Theranos. At the time it was operating in Arizona, it was only after a tremendously intense and expensive lobbying campaign to get approval. That was very much in the news at the time.
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by barbecue_sauce on Sunday October 18, 2026 @12:45PM
(#50142723)
Is your doctor the one who actually takes your blood and sends it in for tests? Where I'm from, the doctor just orders a blood test, and you go to some other lab facility somewhere (with some discretionary choice) and get it done by a phlebotomist and its more or less outside of the doctor's purview.
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by tekla on Sunday October 18, 2026 @01:28PM
(#50143221)
In the USA either my doctor takes the blood, or in certain cases, they have Labcorp or similar do the test (I asked and it was because they didn't have the proper vial labels to do the blood test in house). I also get copies of the test and it has the logo of the testing company.
So yes
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by JumpCrisscross on Sunday October 18, 2026 @03:09PM
(#50144245)
It works both ways. I walked into the Theranos and volunteered for bloodwork. I’ve also had my doctor send my bloodwork order to a lab of my choosing when I’m e.g. traveling.
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by idiotsecant on Sunday October 18, 2026 @03:00PM
(#50144162)
This doesn't make sense. You are just getting your blood drawn. You don't even see who is doing the test until it's done. How on earth would you even know.
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by JumpCrisscross on Sunday October 18, 2026 @03:13PM
(#50144286)
I’m generally discerning of the lab doing my bloodwork. You can look up ratings online. Less out of paranoia for being defrauded and more for comfort.
Re:How the Elizabeth Holmes Doc 'You Can See Everything' Is ...
by JumpCrisscross on Sunday October 18, 2026 @03:08PM
(#50144235)
> was shocked to read that you got Theranos tests
I’d been reading about them for a few years, never got personally involved in any capacity, was in Phoenix for a long-distance relationship and saw the billboard and thought “why not?” When I saw the results I panicked. Ex post facto I figured something went wrong with my draw (full venous draw, by the way).
I have no background in medicine, and I was probably considerably stupider at the time inasmuch as I was in my twenties, so I never connected it to being a fraud, instead concluding their kit didn’t work reliably and that they’d launched prematurely and would have to pull back from the market and regroup (and get sued) for a while.
I got one of these! I called my New York doctor in a panic because apparently my kidneys and liver were failing. We ordered a bunch of rush tests, they came back fine, then we did a bunch more to confirm. That was a lot of stress, wasted medical professionals' time and cost for a single person. (The only reason I didn't go straight to ER is I was doing my start-up at the time and, America being America, didn't have the best health insurance.)
I don't think my doctor reported that result as being wrong. I certainly didn't–I was too busy confronting my impending doom. So my HDHP wound up paying for not only the un-needed follow-up tests, but also for the Theranos test. (I don't remember if I paid a deductible. It was at a Walgreens.)
> She did it before for Paul Logan and Anthony Scaramucci, and now is softening the road for Elizabeth Holmes pardon
She's maintaining access to powerful people. It's a well-known problem with access journalism.