That requires the victim to sue in court, or as some people have speculated OpenAI might have already settled with the victims in private.

They have not caused damage (or enough that a counter party found it worthwhile to sue). They have to pay if they actually cause damage AND someone sues them. Clearly these conditions have not been met, but somehow people feel like some third party (the state?) should just punish OpenAI because of vague feelings.

They have not caused damage?

You forget the people who have unalived themselves because some LLM told them to do so.

>You forget the people who have unalive themselves because some LLM told them to do so.

Besides the obvious conversational derail (we were talking about ai hacking up till now), that case is being litigated right now.

I dont know what the word unalive means

my next door neighbour told me to eat shit (not a nice woman) and … I didn’t … until obeying what LLMs tell you becomes a law people doing shit because LLM told them is natural selection playing out