Re:GLM-Legal: Advancing Agentic Legal Intelligence
by KellyCriterion on Monday October 12, 2026 @02:49PM
(#50060995)
a) I have never met a Lawyer who was able to write a single code line
b) I have met Lawyer colleagues who didnt know how build a =SUM() in Excel
So, I doubt....
Re:GLM-Legal: Advancing Agentic Legal Intelligence
by otterley on Monday October 12, 2026 @03:04PM
(#50061213)
> a) I have never met a Lawyer who was able to write a single code line
That doesn't mean they don't exist. I went to law school with many former software engineers, many of whom are now prosecuting patents on behalf of high tech companies, and some of whom went back to engineering (like me).
"I have never met ______" is of no consequence to anyone; it's an argument style best avoided unless you're talking about deities or space aliens.
Re:GLM-Legal: Advancing Agentic Legal Intelligence
by jester997 on Monday October 12, 2026 @08:08PM
(#50064816)
I met a space alien! His name is Grok and he talks to me when I’m sleeping.
Re:GLM-Legal: Advancing Agentic Legal Intelligence
by jacquesm on Monday October 12, 2026 @04:51PM
(#50062899)
There are a couple right here on HN.
Re:GLM-Legal: Advancing Agentic Legal Intelligence
by konart on Monday October 12, 2026 @04:30PM
(#50062595)
> There’s not much to algorithms: do this, then do that.
Yeah, and how many of drivers or software engineers can fix their car's engine? Just a few. Even though in priciple there's not much to it.
Programmers typically don’t know law outside of which license allows them to get code for free.