News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking?. Parent comment

Re:Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking? by _aavaa_ on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:11AM (#50057587)
Or they want less swearing in their training corpus
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking? by SoftTalker on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:20AM (#50057721)
Yet they include Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit in their training corpus.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking? by nekusar on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:26AM (#50057816)
If you can be surpassed by a statistical average of reddit posts, that's a skill issue.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking? by jayd16 on Monday October 12, 2026 @11:35AM (#50057944)
Seems they could quietly enable automatically pulling such language out of the training.

Which points back to the TOS being "just marketing."

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why aren't AI companies being charged for hacking? by _aavaa_ on Monday October 12, 2026 @03:40PM (#50061862)
But blocking it from the conversations is atomically removing it. Remove the words from the beginning.

The next step would be to also police tone so that only positive or neutral tones are allowed.

[ Parent | on HN ]