Re:Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court
by lapcat on Saturday October 10, 2026 @11:16AM
(#50033789)
> When I said "algorithms", I was referring to the strategy by which I perceived your reply to be constructed (and still do, tbh).
I don't understand what this means.
> Your reply clearly showed that you chose an implausible interpretation
How should I interpret your reply? Wouldn't it be better for you to explain rather than to complain and make me guess, perhaps wrongly?
But I do still take some issue with your own approach. I would have preferred to criticize your arguments, had you brought any up! Of course it's impossible to always respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of anyone's words, but at least you should have settled on any plausible interpretation. Your reply clearly showed that you chose an implausible interpretation, and I stand by my view that it is a bigger violation of the guidelines than you seem to think.