Re:Ask HN: What do you run on a $5 VPS that's worth keeping ...
by ehe78qhe on Friday October 09, 2026 @02:03AM
(#50016568)
RAID is not a backup because anything happening within that file system happens to both drives immediately.
Re:Ask HN: What do you run on a $5 VPS that's worth keeping ...
by tmountain on Friday October 09, 2026 @02:51AM
(#50016944)
ZFS snapshots can help, but this is one layer of a comprehensive backup strategy.
Re:Ask HN: What do you run on a $5 VPS that's worth keeping ...
by j45 on Friday October 09, 2026 @06:12AM
(#50018418)
both drives? Only 2 mirrored drives isn't really what a RAID can be.
Constructing a RAID5 with 4 drives provides failover and recovery if one of the drives dies.
Re:Ask HN: What do you run on a $5 VPS that's worth keeping ...
by lultimouomo on Friday October 09, 2026 @08:24AM
(#50019483)
You can have as much redundancy as you like on your RAID, but if you fat finger an rm -r it's all gone.
A real backup protects both against hardware faults and accidental deletion.
Re:Ask HN: What do you run on a $5 VPS that's worth keeping ...
by j45 on Friday October 09, 2026 @10:32AM
(#50021076)
I’m not implying Raid 5 on its own is a complete backup.
Within a storage array though it does provide redundancy at that level, and generally speaking most people don’t access a raid or NAS at a shell level only where they drop rm -fr’s
Separate and offsite backups are non negotiable, however running a raid 5 locally can greatly reduce storage rebuild/restore time, if a single drive fails the rest of the raid continues to work fine until replaced.
Inherently to inner copy it provides some redundancy.
Backups need more than one copy.