News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Orkut.com by whstl on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:21PM (#50007785)
Other poster is correct, it was a 20% project, so it didn't even cost Google any money to acquire, which is crazy.

I remember it getting absolutely destroyed by Spam at some point. Then they tried some redesigns, and an integration with Google+ that caused more problems than it solved. Each one of these events drove people to other websites.

Re:Orkut.com by lokar on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:39PM (#50008079)
Also, the implementation and infrastructure was a total shit show.
Re:Orkut.com by whstl on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:42PM (#50008131)
True, its downtimes predated the Twitter fail whale.

Interestingly, the first version used ASP.NET, visible in the .aspx domains, which really deviated from other Google tech.

Re:Orkut.com by egeozcan on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:17PM (#50008719)
What is (and was) Google tech? I naively thought Google didn't have a praised stack.
Re:Orkut.com by whstl on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:20PM (#50008761)
Back then it was mostly Java, Python and C++.

They even made a Java-based framework that would generate Javascript, GWT. Orkut was rewritten to use in 2009.

Re:Orkut.com by neuronexmachina on Thursday October 08, 2026 @02:57PM (#50010363)
I used to use GWT. It was such a mess to work with, but an interesting mess.
Re:Orkut.com by merb on Friday October 09, 2026 @02:00AM (#50016550)
Well it used what was available at the time. Which was not a lot, that it even worked is insane
Re:Orkut.com by kamma4434 on Friday October 09, 2026 @06:57AM (#50018751)
We still have it running somewhere. Not pretty but zero issues for a largish GUI
Re:Orkut.com by lokar on Thursday October 08, 2026 @05:00PM (#50012193)
But also a highly specific Linux runtime environment, distributed storage, etc.
Re:Orkut.com by lokar on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:45PM (#50008182)
Yeah, internally it was, uh, an issue.

Just before launch there was a attempt to hide that it was google.