News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on New gTLD Application for .lan. Parent comment

Re:New gTLD Application for .lan by stop50 on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:12PM (#50007655)
Internal. is also an valid option. I moved everything there about a year ago
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New gTLD Application for .lan by throw0101a on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:59PM (#50008421)
.internal is ICANN and not (yet?) an IETF RFC:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.internal

Other special use domains:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special-use_domain_name

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain#Reserved_doma...

* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6761

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New gTLD Application for .lan by jasomill on Thursday October 08, 2026 @06:50PM (#50013542)
Looking at your links, subjective and legacy considerations aside, .alt per RFC 9476[1] seems as good a choice as .lan.

Personally, I just use a registered domain for this purpose, as they're cheap enough to not care (last I checked, I pay $10–20/domain/year for registrations, depending on registrar and TLD, and $0.21/zone/month for hosting public zones on Google Cloud).

[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9476

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New gTLD Application for .lan by simondotau on Thursday October 08, 2026 @08:56PM (#50014645)
A registered domain has the added benefit that you can use the same namespace for externally accessible services. I personally do this (using Cloudflare Tunnels, not open ports).
[ Parent | on HN ]