I gave Opus 5.5 one prompt and six hours to visualize Invisible Cities

Re:I gave Opus 5.5 one prompt and six hours to visualize Inv... by ahknight on Thursday October 08, 2026 @11:24AM (#50006943)

I always consider AI-generated content to be a draft — or, in its parlance: something that takes the shape of the final product.

I don't dismiss the ability of models to create. I dismiss their ability to create finished goods. Humans should always be involved, especially with creative works. Models are great at modeling existing creations and solutions — head starts on long roads — but it's the person that needs to walk it and take the journey.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I gave Opus 5.5 one prompt and six hours to visualize Inv... by npunt on Thursday October 08, 2026 @12:49PM (#50008244)

This pairs well with the saying "art is never finished, it is abandoned."

Abandoned one-shot drafts are akin to speaking words but never finishing a sentence before moving onto the next thought. There's no there there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I gave Opus 5.5 one prompt and six hours to visualize Inv... by digilypse on Thursday October 08, 2026 @01:48PM (#50009223)

Are they really? Nothing of value is produced unless the exact artifact is transmuted into a professional good? There’s nothing to be gained from sketching preliminary drafts or notes because they’re never polished for publication?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I gave Opus 5.5 one prompt and six hours to visualize Inv... by npunt on Thursday October 08, 2026 @02:39PM (#50010077)

Not what I meant. The point was work under a certain grain size of effort has very little (or negative) value to others.

We're in an environment awash in 'content' where every person has an infinite slop producing machine, and a lot of people are publishing nearly zero effort drafts, awed by the appearance of meaning.

[ Parent | on HN ]