I don’t think it helps your argument if this is half of your post. The fact that the pdfs don’t follow a common template? That’s the complaint? Human papers also don’t follow a template.
AFAIK, people are complaining about the lack of this.
If the only way to power a "technology" would be to kill an elephant every time you use it, then it's a flawed technology even if it solved fundamental problems of humanity. This is currently how GenAI sprawling data centers operate AND without solving any fundamental problem of humanity.
Also I don't care about A specific template, I just find it ridiculous that some trillion dollar company cannot put a line like "please keep papers' structure consistent" in whatever markdown file controls these things. It's sloppy, like everything OpenAI does.
There was a bunch public literature on these topics. They were major unsolved problems. Lots of humans would want to have solved them and tried. But here’s it an llm that has solved them.
It's already falling apart.
How much more scientific methodology do you want than formalized lean proofs?
What is this nonsensical complaining about templates and formats? You know that’s just like one additional ask of that particular LLM away.
I am honestly impressed by how many arguably highly intelligent humans are happy to throw out millennia of scientific methodology just because the world-burning probabilistic machine produced an output that tickles their dopamine brain.
Also glancing at the repo. Such an advanced machine, yet failing to output results with a common template. Every pdf is entirely different from the one before, making the work of the poor humans trying to find a sense in it even more difficult.