Please make your substantive points without swipes. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

Does that contradict what I said? In that quote, it says that the NL proof does not correspond to the Lean proof. However, the statement of the theorem in Lean is independent from the NL proof. It comes from a DeepMind repository, which as far as I'm aware has been accepted by the community as a valid formalization of the original Clay Institute statement.

https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/8...

Both proofs may be correct, and the problem may indeed be solved. My point is that it should not be assumed.

> Maybe read the original article before replying, at a minimum.

Maybe read the comment before replying, at a minimum.